What branding, naming and labeling risks should you watch out for when developing a new drinks product?
Product naming and branding can trigger regulatory and reputational problems if not carefully reviewed. Members shared several cautionary examples:
- **Problematic terminology**: Words like "spiked" carry concerning connotations (association with drink-spiking/date rape) and should be avoided or replaced. - **Cartoon characters and milk claims**: The Portman Group will scrutinize products using milk in the name or cartoon fonts on the label, particularly if the combination could appeal to under-18s. - **Unintended double meanings**: The KILIRA case—a Bacardi cream liqueur that could be read as "Kill-IRA"—nearly launched before someone caught the problematic association. Bright orange liquid and a July 12th launch date (significant in Northern Ireland) compounded the issue. Members emphasized the importance of catching these before test launch. - **Implicit negative associations**: Avoid names that conjure unwanted imagery (e.g., "Dirty Banana") or cultural references that could alienate audiences.
**Caveats**: These issues typically surface during internal review or through the Portman Group's code compliance process. It's worth stress-testing brand names and label designs with a diverse group before committing to production, particularly if launching in the UK or Ireland where regulatory scrutiny is high.
Was this helpful?
This answer was distilled from the Kindred Collective community.
Got a question of your own?
Join the Collective to ask the community directly and unlock the full directory.
Join Kindred Collective