Knowledge Base

Ask the Collective

The questions independent drinks founders ask most — answered. Distilled from years of community knowledge so the good stuff never disappears in the feed again.

People & Suppliers3 discussions

How should producers negotiate with packaging suppliers when facing significant cost increases?

Members face substantial cost increases from glass suppliers (ranging from 9.5% to 20%+), but pricing negotiations require careful handling. **Key suppliers and their increases:** **Saver Glass** reported 9.5%, **Allied** at 20%, and **Bruni** positioning between the two. **Berlin** has also tightened supply (no stock until Feb 2022 in one case), forcing some to find alternatives. **Recommended tactics:** - **Collective solidarity approach** — Members suggested that individually they are small customers to major glass companies, but combined they represent stronger negotiating power. A coordinated approach to suppliers could soften price increases more effectively than individual negotiation. - **Keep sourcing options open** — Maintain multiple supplier relationships and always have a BATNA (best alternative to negotiated agreement) ready when suppliers apply pressure. - **Don't pass increases directly to consumers** — Members warned that consumers won't accept sizable price rises and will switch to competitor brands in their price point. Retail and on-trade buyers have the same mentality and won't accept rises that affect market fit. - **Beware of cartel concerns** — Members explicitly flagged that sharing pricing discussion or coordinating price increases could constitute cartel behaviour and should be avoided. Cost of goods information and response is acceptable; pricing discussion is "a no go." **Caveat:** The pressure is real—producers are caught between supplier increases and market resistance to price rises, creating a "bumpy ride." The best defence is keeping sourcing options as open as possible.

#supplier-negotiations#packaging-costs#cost-management#procurement
Sales, Marketing & PR3 discussions

What gross margin should I expect on retail gift packs (bottle with glassware or accompanying items), and is it worth the effort?

Members report **gross margins of 45–50%** on bottle/glassware gift packs when sold through retail. However, the community consensus is cautious: **Margin reality:** - Gross margin is similar or worse than selling a single bottle alone, despite higher retail shelf price (typically £25 RRP for a pack sold at £11–£12 wholesale) - **Cardboard and assembly costs are significant** and erode per-unit margin substantially - Cardboard costs drop sharply with volume, creating a trap: the temptation to over-order in bulk leads to excess stock write-offs if sales underperform **Operational challenges:** - Gift packs are labour-intensive to assemble (in-house or outsourced cost) - Damage in post is common, eating into already-thin margins - Real-world performance is poor: one member ordered 1,000 units for Christmas and sold only ~100, losing money overall **When to do it:** - Members recommend gift packs primarily as a **brand awareness and seasonal tactic** (Christmas peaks), not for margin - **Minis/smaller gift sets are growing**, suggesting better ROI at lower price points - Margin is "really just to try and tap into gifting peaks" **Bottom line:** Margins are adequate on paper but are offset by operational friction, wastage risk, and poor sell-through. Only pursue if strategic value (brand lift, seasonal revenue spikes) justifies the effort.

#gift-packs#retail-margins#packaging-costs#seasonal-strategy