What approach works best for on-trade venue activations—should brands collaborate or compete?
Members strongly favour **collaborative activations over competitive ones**, describing them as more creative and effective for building relationships with venues and audiences.
**Key recommendations:**
- **Partner with complementary brands** rather than competing directly. Members highlighted a successful co-branded activation as "one of the best activations I have seen in years," emphasising the value of "collaborating not competing." - **Expect venue margins of 20–25% on spirits** when working with chain venues like **Inn Express**; factor this into your activation economics. - **Build relationships with venue group decision-makers early**. Members note that venue groups like **Open House London** (which operates The Lighterman, The Broadcaster, The Italian Greyhound, and Boxcar) are worth targeting directly; introducing yourself via site visits and building rapport with marketing leadership can open doors for summer activations and menu placements. - **Be prepared to generate takings that offset activation costs**—members joked about running tabs and placing bets during activations to cover stand costs.
**Caveat:** Collaborative events can get "out of hand" as the day progresses, so plan your activation timing and engagement strategy carefully.
Was this helpful?
This answer was distilled from the Kindred Collective community.
Got a question of your own?
Join the Collective to ask the community directly and unlock the full directory.
Join Kindred Collective